Skip to main content

Mr. Big Bank Executive You Owe Me.

This is a reply to Tobold post today about a Fair Distribution of Profits from Banking.

Tobold if you set-up up a company selling mousetraps and it goes bust due to mis-managament then I may feel sorry for you but unless I was foolish enough to invest in your enterprise I don't end up paying your bills.

The past year has shown us very clearly that this is not the case for financial institutions. Every citizen ends up paying dearly for  mistakes in the banking and financial services sector.

This shows us that although we didn't realise it at the time  they were actually gambling with public money, our money, because of our dependence on a working financial sector and the public necessity of underwriting their bad debts.

Of course this means that that we need strong regulation to prevent financial institutions from gambling recklessly with our money. This is a lesson we seem to have to re-learn every few decades.

I believe it also means that it is absolutely wrong for the profits of gambling with funds implicitly underwritten by the public purse to be commandeered by such a small group. Any claims that these are a super elite who can only be motivated to do the wonderful things they do by astronomical salaries and bonuses are made laughable by the rampant evidence of outrageous incompetence, general untrustworthiness and greed motivated recklessness that these high paid high flyers have exhibited over the last few years. Yes cap salaries. Yes get rid of ridiculous bonuses. In fact not only do I want to limit indivduals ability to cream off an excessive return from taking risks with my money I also want to ensure that the institutions themselves are forced to pay us back for that "free underwriting" they enjoy. Perhaps this means part public ownership. Perhaps it means higher taxation. Perhaps it means being forced to pay hefty "financial insurance" premiums. 


Thallian said…
good post. I think public ownership might cause more problems than it solves, but increased taxation and financial insurance with increased premiums for failure are good ideas that will help regulate them some and make all profits from the insurance go back to the public they are taking advantage of.
mbp said…
You are probably right that nationalising banks is not the ideal solution. This is not about left versus right wing politics though. Even the most staunchly right wing free marketeer understands that if someone is gambling with your money then you should have a) some control over the risks they are taking and b) a decent share of the profits.
Thallian said…
too true
Anonymous said…
Interesting that you blame the bank for taking a risk and missing, rather than the government for letting the bank fail for missing. You would limit salaries instead of increase accountability. I say get the government out of the way and let them reap what they sow. A government bailout costs everyone, and teaches risk takers that there is a safety net.
mbp said…
I absolutely blame bankers for the outrageous risks they took with assets that were entrusted to them. The absolute primary requirement of a bank is that they do not lose the money which is under their care. Certainly governments and financial regulators were also extremely culpable but when someone commits a murder the finger of blame points first to the murderer not to the police for letting it happen.

If the banks were let fail as would happen with any normal business then I wouldn't care how much they pay themselves but governments all over the world have decided that banks are too valuable a resource to let fail. Given this scenario, which effectively means that I am underwriting the speculation of banks then I feel entitled to demand salary caps as well as tight regulation of their activities.
Tesh said…
Bankers and government. If memory serves, good old Thomas Jefferson had a few words of warning about both.

Pity we've ignored him.
Anonymous said…
mpb - where is the accountability for the "outrageous risks they took with assets that were entrusted to them"? There are no consequences for the risk takers if the government comes in and bails them out. They don't get sued by the public, they don't get prosecuted by the district attorney, burned in effigy by a mob, ruined by the press. They get a free safety net. And then because they have no black mark on their name, they go get another job and take even bigger risks because they are certain to get bailed out again.

Risk controls don't mean anything if there are no consequences of failing. Reputation doesn't mean anything if you are never at risk for damage.
mbp said…
I don't disagree with you - I would like to see those who took the risks bear be accountable for the consequences. However there is a strong message out there which seems to be influencing governments that says "we cannot allow these institutions to fail or else we will all suffer". I am not an economist. I don't know what would happen if we let all the banks fail. However the very fact that they appear to have this power over us to frighten public and politicians into thinking that they can't be let fail is enough to differentiate them from normal businesses which are left to sink or swim on their own resources. This is what justifies my demands for tighter controls on the risks they take and their remuneration.

Popular posts from this blog

My First Gaming Mouse: Logitech G300

I bought a gaming mouse yesterday a Logitech G300, here my initial thoughts. What is a gaming mouse?  There are a wide variety of devices available classified as gaming mice but a few features  seem common: 1. Wired rather than wireless: Although some high end models are wireless wired connections are just better and faster than wireless so most gaming mice stick with wired. As a bonus wired mice don't need batteries so the mouse is lighter.  2. High response rate: 1 to 2ms response rate so the mouse immediately responds to input.  2. High DPI. Gaming mice invariable boast high DPI numbers from 2,000 DPI upwards. This makes the device very responsive to the smallest movements.   3. Adjustable DPI . High DPI improves responsiveness but reduces precision so gaming mice generally allow you to adjust the DPI down for precise work such as pulling off headshots in sniper mode. Generally the mouse allows dpi to be changed on the fly by pressing a button.  4. Extr

Portal 2 two screen coop on one PC.

I mentioned before that I intended to try Portal 2 in "unofficial split screen co-op mode. Well split screen on a small computer monitor is a recipe for a headache especially when the game defies gravity as much as portal. However a minor bit of extra fiddling allowed us to drive two seperate screens from one PC. The Steam forums describes a complicated method of doing this that I couldn't get working so this simpler method which worked for me might be of use to someone. 1. First I followed the instructions in this post to get split screen multi-player working: A minor issue not mentioned is that you need to enable the console from the keyboard/mouse options menu I am using keyboard and one wired Xbox360 controller as suggested. Getting the controller to switch to channel 2 was tricky at first but as Chameleon8 mentions plugging it out and in again during loading works. The trick for me was to do the plug / p

Return to New Eden and a Secret Confession

I feel a growing temptation to return to EVE but having been away from mmos for quite a while I am not quite ready to resubscribe.  Instead I started a disposable character on a free trial to test my resolve.  Knowing that this character will be thrown in the bin in a couple of weeks is actually quite liberating. Freed from the fear of gimping my character I feet no necessity to min max anything. I picked a Gallente because I think they have cool looking spaceships and went from there. First obvious change since I last played is being able to walk around my Captain's quarters. Its a nice idea but hardly a game changer. Can you decorate your quarters I wonder and if so do these home improvements move around with you wherever you go? The second obvious change is the much improved tutorial. I managed to make it through the first steps introduction without having to resort to on-line help or the  chat channel which is a first for me in EVE. Even better once you have finis